Toyota Harrier Owner
#11
Posted 17 March 2009 - 12:25 PM
What's the Harriers' 2.4L and 3.0L fuel consumption like?
Thanks.
#12
Posted 17 March 2009 - 02:20 PM
What's the Harriers' 2.4L and 3.0L fuel consumption like?
Thanks.
Mine 3.0L is giving me 7km/L ( city ), 10-11km/L ( highway )
#13
Posted 18 March 2009 - 11:26 AM
#14
Posted 18 March 2009 - 06:16 PM
Wow, that's really not that bad for a car like that.
#15
Posted 19 March 2009 - 01:02 AM
heard that 3.0L perform similar with 2.2L on city driving ( 2.2L under power for frequent start-stop environment ), but 2.2L excels in highway.
#16
Posted 24 March 2009 - 05:56 PM
#17
Posted 24 March 2009 - 06:51 PM
where di you do your service ?
my gearbox has some hiccup ( won't go to 4th gear in the morning ). And I am looking for one reliable workshop.
#18
Posted 26 March 2009 - 09:14 PM
my gearbox has some hiccup ( won't go to 4th gear in the morning ). And I am looking for one reliable workshop.
CBU TOYOTA in Kajang..... sometimes I will go WALD service in Jalan Chan Shau Lin....
#19
Posted 31 March 2009 - 03:51 AM
pls correct me if i am wrong, k.
there are a few variation in engine of both the first generation and 2nd generation, right?
the VVTI, V6, AWD and 2WD .. which is the most economical to run? to maintain?
thanks
sam
#20
Posted 31 March 2009 - 05:07 PM
pls correct me if i am wrong, k.
there are a few variation in engine of both the first generation and 2nd generation, right?
the VVTI, V6, AWD and 2WD .. which is the most economical to run? to maintain?
thanks
sam
1st Generation
2.2L I4 (5S-FE) = FWD (MCU10) or AWD (MCU15)
2.4L I4 (2AZ-FE) = FWD (MCU10) or AWD (MCU15) ... facelift version
3.0L v6 (1MZ-FE) = FWD (MCU10)or AWD (MCU15)
FWD = Front Wheel Drive
AWD = All Wheel Drive
Most economical to run = low petrol consumption and road tax ( i.e. 2.2L )
Most economical to maintain = engine that has less parts ( i.e. FWD )